Human touch in gen AI: Training models to capture nuance 

Graphic depicts a woman annotator using headphones and a computer to illustrate the human touch in generative AI training

Training generative AI models has evolved far beyond basic labeling tasks. To teach powerful machines to understand and generate human-like responses, we must create in them the attributes that lie at the heart of humanity: cultural context, nuance, and sensitivity. 

Without a human touch in the data annotation stage, gen AI risks being tone-deaf, biased, or it will fail to grasp the broad spectrum of human experiences and emotions, as we’ve seen with chatbots struggling to recognize sarcasm or image generators unintentionally amplifying existing gender or race stereotypes.

But how can we build AI models capable of engaging with the full richness of human expression? This article sheds light on some of the new parameters of high-quality training data and provides actionable tips to get started.

This article is the first in our blog post series exploring the new quality standards for generative AI data annotation. Here, we delve into the role of humanity for training gen AI. Learn more about the essential standards around precision and insight in our recent posts.

Table of Contents

Humanity in gen AI data annotation

Data annotation is not just about accuracy and precision. It requires human expertise and careful oversight to ensure AI models interact with the world in a meaningful, relevant, and responsible way.  

Drawing from our most recent whitepaper, “Beyond accuracy: The new standards for quality in human data annotation for generative AI,” these are the four key standards closely related to infusing humanity into training data:

Cultural context & sensitivity 

To reflect diverse cultural perspectives, data annotation teams must be mindful of linguistic, social, and cultural norms across regions. This introduces a new set of annotation skills beyond multilingual proficiency, including sociolinguistic expertise, cultural fluency, and empathy.

A few takeaways from Sigma’s expertise:

  • Diverse data annotation teams start with an inclusive recruitment process, which focuses on candidates’ relevant skills and expertise, and avoids discriminatory filters and biases.
  • Annotators with varied backgrounds, experiences, and cultures typically create richer, more representative datasets.
  • Feedback loops throughout the data annotation process ensure consistency and allow annotators to identify cultural nuances and refine annotation guidelines.

Nuance and contextual understanding

Capturing the delicate (and often subjective) aspects of human communication is still an ongoing challenge for gen AI. To produce content that sounds authentically human, the gen AI training process needs to capture the subtle variations in tone, intent, and meaning within the data. This demands deep linguistic knowledge, semantic analysis skills, and the ability to adapt to diverse domains for annotators.  

A few takeaways from Sigma’s expertise:

  • Detailed annotation guidelines that address nuances and contextual elements enable annotators to apply a consistent and standardized approach.
  • While providing illustrative examples in guidelines is helpful, you need to be cautious to avoid introducing bias in the annotation process.
  • Implement rigorous selection processes and skills tests to identify annotators with strong linguistic knowledge and sensitivity to subtle variations in communication.

Bias mitigation

Because gen AI models learn from their training data, a lack of human supervision can amplify and reproduce existing inequalities. To identify and mitigate inherent biases, annotators require knowledge of ethical AI training principles and awareness of the principles protecting underrepresented and disadvantaged communities, such as diversity, equity and inclusion.  

A few takeaways from Sigma’s expertise:

  • Prioritize diversity within annotation teams, considering demographic factors such as gender, ethnicity, age, and cultural background, and incorporating subject matter experts from diverse fields.
  • Develop comprehensive annotation guidelines to minimize ambiguity and avoid biased interpretations.
  • Implement regular quality checks and feedback loops specifically focused on identifying and addressing potential biases in the annotated data.

Depth/breadth of data

Datasets must be varied, inclusive, and accurately represent the intended user population of the gen AI model to avoid narrow, irrelevant, or repetitive responses. When they are imbalanced or lack sufficient representation, the quality of the resulting output suffers. 

Ideally, there should be a balance between data breadth — covering multiple domains, industries, and demographic groups — and depth, ensuring a granular understanding of specific topics.  

A few takeaways from Sigma’s expertise:

  • Prioritize diverse and inclusive annotation teams to ensure a wide range of perspectives and experiences in the training data.  
  • Conduct a thorough dataset diversity analysis to identify and address potential gaps in representation across various demographic groups and domains.
  • Implement gap assessments in model performance to pinpoint areas where the AI’s understanding is lacking due to insufficient data diversity.

Ready to dive deeper into the essential elements of high-quality training data? Download Sigma’s latest whitepaper,Beyond accuracy: The new standards for quality in human data annotation for generative AI,to explore how to generate the nuanced and representative data your gen AI models need to understand and engage like a human. 

Want to learn more? Contact us ->
Sigma offers tailor-made solutions for data teams annotating large volumes of training data.
EN